潘新 2011-09-11 18:41 通过短信：
虚拟组织的各项难点至少证明bfic在其所在领域目前是无法被超越的
转发(0) | 评论(0)
潘新 2011-09-03 19:17 通过短信：
“霍金家的人思维太敏捷了，甚至超出了他们的语言能力。这就是他们家的人口吃、结巴，说话如此笨拙的原因”
转发(0) | 评论(1)
潘新 2011-08-25 15:56 通过短信：
对于人际和内容的交叉和“智能化”编织（knotting）本身就可以扩大网络效应
潘新 2011-08-21 21:17 通过短信：
Gibbon, of course, lived before the era of the science of economics, so his analysis of Rome's decline completely lacks that dimension. Gibbon was a contemporary of the first economist, Adam Smith, so that type of knowledge was still very basic.a bit like China started its 500 year decline from the point where the opinions of 朱熹 became the orthodoxy and other opinions were nottolerated.Classical Rome tolerated many schools of thought: stoics, epicureans, sceptics etc. But after Theodosius adopted orthodox Christianity, freedom of thought died. With that dies innovation and progress.Well, I agree with with Gibbon's principal thesis that the rise of Christianity - which imposes a harsh orthodoxy on people and discourages independent thought - was an important factor in the fall of Rome.I thought you had it a couple of weeks ago.
潘新 2011-08-21 21:16 通过短信：
hmm, I'm not sure. I understand the thesis - you don't have to invent technology if you have slaves to do the work - but "technology" as a marker of civvilization's progress is a 20th century idea. It is the decline in philosphy, literature, culture and the arts that were the decline of ancient civilizations like Rome. Technology was always rudimentary.
潘新 2011-08-21 21:14 通过短信：
Yes it lasted much longer than most civilizations. In general I think freedom of thought is much more important than technical and economic conditions.
I guess that historian who said that Rome declined because of slavery was some kind of Marxist. I personally don't think slavery hindered Rome's development. All civilizations including today depend on slavery.
In today's world civilizations depend on the cheap factory labour of Indonesia, Vietnam etc - although we don't admit it, that is also slavery.
潘新 2011-08-21 21:13 通过短信：
However I still don't think these economic factors are so important. Freedom of thought is the most important. Spain was always one of the most conservative catholic countries. Free thought was ruthlessly surpressed there by the Spanish Inquisition. That is the most important reason why it declined, not the discovery of easy wealth through silver.
That's interesting, I hadn't thought about that.
潘新 2011-08-21 21:12 通过短信：
i finally found the history of the fall and decline of the roman empire, but only volume three
潘新 2011-08-21 21:11 通过短信：
i read the abridged english version, but too slowly
so whats your conclusion after reading the book?
the viewpoint of the author of a global history is the slavory prevented from further technical development of rome
潘新 2011-08-21 21:10 通过短信：
its true. just like the robbery of silver by the spanish prevented them from the industrial revolution, which finally made spain the second-tier countryin europe
rather than why it declined,historians question why the roman empire were in existence for so long
潘新 2011-08-21 21:09 通过短信：
潘新 2011-08-13 14:27 通过短信：
微博建立的是一套完整意义的控制论系统，linkedin系统内部信息反馈相对较慢
潘新 2011-08-05 10:07 于 上海 通过网站：
霍金讲现代哲学已经跟不上科学的发展速度，也很难再出现笛卡尔、康德、罗素这样的人物
历史/哲学 | 转发(0) | 评论(0)
潘新 2011-08-04 22:48 通过短信：
大胆预测信息时代经济学法则：信息和共享的内驱动力促进全球效率提高（苹果的封闭系统难以建立古罗马一样伟大的帝国）；“信息产消总值”超越“国民生产总值”；虚拟驱动物理世界、虚拟与物理世界融合
IT/互联网 | 转发(0) | 评论(0)